When printing this page, you must include the entire legal notice. This material may not be published, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use.
Darwin Quotes Quote 57 "There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God.
There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation, that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved years ago by Louis Pasteur and others.
That leaves us with the only possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God. I will not accept that philosophically because I do not want to believe in God. Therefore, I choose to believe in that which I know is scientifically impossible; spontaneous generation arising to evolution.
If he had photocopies of the paper, that would not have happened.
The correct citation is: The Origin of Life. Thompson I went to the library and found the [September ] article. The quote is a complete fabrication. What the article does say is: The great idea emerges originally in the consciousness of the race as a vague intuition; and this is the form it keeps, rude and imposing, in myth, tradition and poetry.
This is its core, its enduring aspect. In this form science finds it, clothes it with fact, analyses its content, develops its detail, rejects it, and finds it ever again.
In achieving the scientific view, we do not ever wholly lose the intuitive, the mythological. Both have meaning for us, and neither is complete without the other. The Book of Genesis contains still our poem of the Creation; and when God questions Job out of the whirlwind, He questions us.
Let me cite an example. Throughout our history we have entertained two kinds of views of the origin of life: In the 17th to 19th centuries those opinions provided the ground of a great and bitter controversy.
There came a curious point, toward the end of the 18th century, when each side of the controversy was represented by a Roman Catholic priest.
The principle opponent of the theory of the spontaneous generation was then the Abbe Lazzaro Spallanzani, an Italian priest; and its principal champion was John Turberville Needham, an English Jesuit. Since the only alternative to some form of spontaneous generation is a belief in supernatural creation, and since the latter view seems firmly implanted in the Judeo-Christian theology, I wondered for a time how a priest could support the theory of spontaneous generation.
Needham tells one plainly. The opening paragraphs of the Book of Genesis can in fact be reconciled with either view. In its first account of Creation, it says not quite that God made living things, but He commanded the earth and waters to produce them.
The language used is: Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind.
The myth itself therefore offers justification for either view. Needham took the position that the earth and waters, having once been ordered to bring forth life, remained ever after free to do so; and this is what we mean by spontaneous generation. This great controversy ended in the midth century with the experiments of Louis Pasteur, which seemed to dispose finally of the possibility of spontaneous generation.
For almost a century afterward biologists proudly taught their students this history and the firm conclusion that spontaneous generation had been scientifically refuted and could not possibly occur.
Does this mean that they accepted the alternative view, a supernatural creation of life? They had no theory of the origin of life, and if pressed were likely to explain that questions involving such unique events as origins and endings have no place in science.
A few years ago, however, this question re-emerged in a new form. Conceding that spontaneous generation doe not occur on earth under present circumstances, it asks how, under circumstances that prevailed earlier upon this planet, spontaneous generation did occur and was the source of the earliest living organisms.
Within the past 10 years this has gone from a remote and patchwork argument spun by a few venturesome persons--A. Oparin in Russia, J. Haldane in England--to a favored position, proclaimed with enthusiasm by many biologists.The table below presents an abbreviated geologic time scale, with times and events germane to this essay.
Please refer to a complete geologic time scale when this one seems inadequate. The book by Michael Denton, "Evolution: A Theory in Crisis," is a secular critique of orthodox Darwinism. It is thoughtful, logical, empirical and well-written.
Denton is sympathetic and fair, showing rare insight and compassion towards Charles Darwin. Charles Darwin's Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection - Charles Darwin's theory of evolution centres on the idea that species compete to survive, and favorable characteristics are passed on from one generation to the next.
Darwin said that evolution took place by a . Is evolutionary science due for a major overhaul – or is talk of ‘revolution’ misguided? I went to the library and found the [September ] article. The quote is a complete fabrication. What the article does say is: The great idea emerges originally in the consciousness of the race as a vague intuition; and this is the form it keeps, rude and imposing, in myth, tradition and poetry.
The Online Writing Lab (OWL) at Purdue University houses writing resources and instructional material, and we provide these as a free service of the Writing Lab at Purdue.