February 26, at 5: Statistics on the number of people who suffer from these symptoms would help bring credibility to the argument. What is the correlation between increases in population and the increased dangers of DHMO?
I NQUIRY Fundamentally, the various scientific disciplines are alike in their reliance on evidence, the use of hypothesis and theories, the kinds of logic used, and much more. Nevertheless, scientists differ greatly from one another in what phenomena they investigate and in how they go about their work; in the reliance they place on historical data or on experimental findings and on qualitative or quantitative methods; in their recourse to fundamental principles; and in how much they draw on the findings of other sciences.
Still, the exchange of techniques, information, and concepts goes on all the time among scientists, and there are common understandings among them about what constitutes an investigation that is scientifically valid. Scientific inquiry is not easily described apart from the context of particular investigations.
There simply is no fixed set of steps that scientists always follow, no one path that leads them unerringly to scientific knowledge. There are, however, certain features of science that give it a distinctive character as a mode of inquiry.
Although those features are especially characteristic of the work of professional scientists, everyone can exercise them in thinking scientifically about many matters of interest in everyday life. Science Demands Evidence Sooner or later, the validity of scientific claims is settled by referring to observations of phenomena.
Hence, scientists concentrate on getting accurate data. Such evidence is obtained by observations and measurements taken in situations that range from natural settings such as a forest to completely contrived ones such as the laboratory.
To make their observations, scientists use their own senses, instruments such as microscopes that enhance those senses, and instruments that tap characteristics quite different from what humans can sense such as magnetic fields.
In some circumstances, scientists can control conditions deliberately and precisely to obtain their evidence. They may, for example, control the temperature, change the concentration of chemicals, or choose which organisms mate with which others. By varying just one condition at a time, they can hope to identify its exclusive effects on what happens, uncomplicated by changes in other conditions.
Often, however, control of conditions may be impractical as in studying starsor unethical as in studying peopleor likely to distort the natural phenomena as in studying wild animals in captivity. In such cases, observations have to be made over a sufficiently wide range of naturally occurring conditions to infer what the influence of various factors might be.
Because of this reliance on evidence, great value is placed on the development of better instruments and techniques of observation, and the findings of any one investigator or group are usually checked by others.
But they tend to agree about the principles of logical reasoning that connect evidence and assumptions with conclusions. Scientists do not work only with data and well-developed theories. Often, they have only tentative hypotheses about the way things may be.
Such hypotheses are widely used in science for choosing what data to pay attention to and what additional data to seek, and for guiding the interpretation of data. In fact, the process of formulating and testing hypotheses is one of the core activities of scientists.
To be useful, a hypothesis should suggest what evidence would support it and what evidence would refute it. A hypothesis that cannot in principle be put to the test of evidence may be interesting, but it is not likely to be scientifically useful.
The use of logic and the close examination of evidence are necessary but not usually sufficient for the advancement of science. Scientific concepts do not emerge automatically from data or from any amount of analysis alone.
Inventing hypotheses or theories to imagine how the world works and then figuring out how they can be put to the test of reality is as creative as writing poetry, composing music, or designing skyscrapers.
Sometimes discoveries in science are made unexpectedly, even by accident.The Common Rule directs IRBs to ensure that research risks are minimized through careful study design and that risks are "reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, if any, to subjects, and the importance of the knowledge that may reasonably be expected to result." a study presenting similar procedures and potential for harm may.
Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) can be dangerous to humans. Dihydrogen Monoxide causes death and destruction.
Dihydrogen Monoxide is found in acid rain. , and we'll gladly attempt to keep you up-to-date on current developments in the study of Dihydrogen Monoxide, its uses and misuses. Show me these Stooges writes After initial reservations I've used this around the home garden.
The World Health Organisation classified Glyphosate as Class 2A – probably carcinogenic after their study . Sarah Pope had these fancy charts on how it is actually the increase in hygine and cleaner conditions that we live in now which is the direct result of decline of measles, mumps, and polio.
Dihydrogen Monoxide (DHMO) is a colorless and odorless chemical compound, also referred to by some as Dihydrogen Oxide, Hydrogen Hydroxide, Hydronium Hydroxide, or simply Hydric acid. For the past few years, I have been researching the ins and outs of how our bodies handle toxins and where those toxins come from.
When I come across an ingredient I cannot pronounce, a chemical I have never heard of, or an unintelligible acronym, I do what any person (I hope) would do.